UNVEILING SOCIAL MEDIA CLASSIFICATIONS: STRATEGIES FOR IMPACTFUL MARKETING

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12191375%20

Authors

  • Michael Ndapewa Shilongo Faculty of Economics and Management Science, University of Namibia, Namibia

Keywords:

Conversation skills, English textbook analysis, undergraduate education, learning dispositions, interactive activities

Abstract

Social media usage and applications are on the upsurge. Marketers must synchronize advertising content, consumer profile and social media applications for impactful advertising. Nevertheless, social media applications proportionally grew in numbers and types giving both marketers and consumers endless options and creating confusion in choice. This study used factor analysis to classify social media into three classifications marketers can use to target consumers during social media marketing campaigns. The study suggested novel practical marketing stratagems for social media marketing practitioners. This study pursued a positivist research philosophy. In particular, an empirical research methodological approach was adopted for this study. The reliability of the scales in the research instrument was tested using the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Systematic random sampling was employed to reach a sample of 355 consumers. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used to perform regression analysis in validating the research model. Findings revealed three types of social media exist, formal, informal and entertainment social media. Formal social media being the main social media is influenced by entertainment social media and informal social media. In addition, informal social media platforms are WhatsApp, Twitter Instagram, Facebook, and others. While entertainment social media platforms are YouTube and Snapchat. Future research can focus on social media products for marketing as well as focused social media on age marketing. Future studies can determine the relationships between age versus focused social media usage and product versus focused social media correlations.

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Shilongo , M. N. (2024). UNVEILING SOCIAL MEDIA CLASSIFICATIONS: STRATEGIES FOR IMPACTFUL MARKETING . Interdisciplinary Journal of Linguistics, Marketing and Communication (IJLMC), 11(2), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12191375

Issue

Section

Original Peer Review Articles

References

Al-alak BA, Alnawas IA (2018). Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(2), 201-221.

Berliner T (2016). Mobile marketing: A scoping study of the literature and issues for future research. Information Development, 32(3), 527-553.

Berman SJ (2016). Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy and Leadership, 40(2), 16-24.

Burns RB, Burns RA (2008). Business Research Methods and Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Cameron D, Gregory C, Battaglia D (2012). Nielsen personalizes the mobile shopping app. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(3), 333-338.

Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253-267.

Hejase AJ, Hejase HJ (2013). Research Methods A Practical Approach for Business Students (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA, USA: Masadir Inc.

Figure 3. Model 2. Final proposed framework.

Michael Ndapewa Shilongo (2024)

Interdisciplinary Journal of Linguistics, Marketing and Communication| https://sadijournals.org/index.php/IJLMC

Hejase HJ, El Skaff D, Hamdar B, Hejase AJ (2017). Trauma Awareness and Education in Lebanon: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Middle East and North Africa Sciences, 3(10), 8-31.

Hejase HJ, Haddad Z, Hamdar B, Al Ali R, Hejase AJ, Beyrouti N (2014). Knowledge Sharing: Assessment of Factors Affecting Employee' Motivation and Behavior in the Lebanese Organizations. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 3(12), 1549-1593.

Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

International Telecommunications Union (2008). Worldwide mobile cellular subscribers to reach 4 billion-mark late 2018. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/council/C2008/index.html

Johnson P, Clark M (2013). Business and management research methodologies. New Delhi: Sage.

Kaplan A, Haenlein M (2010). Users of the world unite: The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.

Kline RB (2010). Promise and pitfalls of structural equation modeling in gifted research.

Persaud A, Azhar I (2012). Innovative mobile marketing via smartphones: Are consumers ready? Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 30(4), 418-443.

Roach G (2009). Consumer perceptions of mobile phone marketing: A direct marketing innovation. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(2), 124-138.

Saunders M, Lewis C, Thornhill A (2012). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education: India.

Srivastava J (2005). Mobile phones & the evolution of social behavior. Behavior and Information Technology, 24(2), 111-129.

Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.