HIGHER EDUCATION IN NIGERIA: A CASE STUDY OF IMPROVIZATIONAL APPROACHES TO BLENDED LEARNING AT THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, KANO

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13331291

Authors

  • Ahmad Umar Salisu Physics Department, Federal University of Education Kano.
  • Yaro Ibrahim Getso Physics Department, Federal University of Education Kano.
  • Umar Abubakar Idris Physics Department, Federal University of Education Kano.

Keywords:

Blended learning, technology in education, teacher-made achievement test, academic performance, and virtual classroom.

Abstract

Blended learning is an emerging concept that employs active processes in both real and virtual environments and passive mechanisms to enhance teaching and learning experiences. However, its adoption in Nigerian public institutions is hampered, in part, by a shortage of ICT facilities and insufficient skilled teachers. The current study sought to devise a strategic improvisation using handheld cellular devices available to students to experiment with the blended learning methodology, thereby verifying its feasibility and assessing its potential impact on students’ academic performance. A true experimental design was used with a treatment group of 20 randomly chosen students from 82 students. The treatment group was subjected to a blended learning approach using the Google Classroom platform, whereas the control group was limited to traditional teaching methods. The performance of the various groups was measured using a teacher-made achievement test, and the collected data were analyzed using SPSS software. A one-tailed, one-sample t-test was employed to determine whether the treatment group's mean achievement score (M=31.5) improved significantly. The result of the average mean achievement score of students taught using blended learning pedagogy (M=48.35, SD=13.236) was substantially higher than the typical average mean achievement score of students, t (19) =3.075, p=0.002, d=1.273,95% Cl [0.762,1.760]. It is thus suggested, among other things, that university administrations offer sufficient ICT infrastructure to facilitate the seamless adoption of blended learning.

Published

2024-08-16

How to Cite

Ahmad , U. S., Yaro , I. G., & Umar , A. I. (2024). HIGHER EDUCATION IN NIGERIA: A CASE STUDY OF IMPROVIZATIONAL APPROACHES TO BLENDED LEARNING AT THE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, KANO. Interdisciplinary Journal of Educational Practice (IJEP), 11(3), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13331291

Issue

Section

Original Peer Review Articles

References

Andrew, J. (2011). Blended Learning: Undergraduate Students’ Experiences of Using Technology to Support Their Learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 14(2), 3–11.

Dziuban, C., Miskal, P., Thompson, J., & Fawcett, A. (2018). Blended Learning: New Normal and Emerging Technologies. Rutledge. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

Eilers, M. (2020). Blended Learning: Integrating Online and Face-to-Face Learning to Promote Student Engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 42.

Federal Ministry of Education. (2013). National Policy on Education. Nigeria.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Google Classroom.com. Available at: https://classroom.google.com/c/NDkyMzc5NTczNTY3

Jaja, S. A. (2013). Overpopulation Growth and the Crisis of Educational Quality in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(11), 1–12.

Kazu, İ., & Demirkol, M. (2014). Blended learning and traditional learning: A comparative study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(2), 189-198.

Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting blended learning: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V15I1.182

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended Learning Effectiveness: The Relationship between Student Characteristics, Design Features, and Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Lalima, S., and Lata-Dangwal, M. (2017). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and challenges. Journal of Management and Science, 7(1), 33-45.

Lalima, D., & Lata-Dangwal, K. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116

Namyssova, G. A., O. B. Nechaeva, Khairullin, K. N. Gazizov, R. R., & Syzdykbayeva, A. S. (2019). ICT in Education: Interactive Learning in Network Communities. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 191, 1717–1721.

Nazarenko, A. (2015). E-Learning in Post-Soviet Countries: Not Only Opportunities, but Also Challenges. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 1025–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.018

Parsad, B. and Lewis, L. (2008). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions: 2006–07. National Center for Education Statistics.

Pavla, C., Hana, C. and Ludek, K. (2015). Supporting the blend of teaching and learning: Key success factors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1961-1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.238

Siew-Eng, K., & Muuk, H. (2015). The use of blended learning among secondary school students in Malaysia. TOJET: Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.677

Smith, J. R. (2020). Blended Learning Models: Definitions, Challenges, and Best Practices. IGI Global.